Simpson's Paradox: Understanding and Randomized Trials

In course

Veniam exercitation incididunt fugiat commodo. Qui Lorem dolore laborum esse. Fugiat in fugiat proident velit cupidatat incididunt eiusmod culpa anim nulla aliquip sit.

Description

This lecture delves into the Simpson's Paradox using the kidney stone recovery example, highlighting how the paradox arises from the interaction of variables and the importance of randomized trials in avoiding confounding factors.

Instructor

cillum proident

Sint minim ut voluptate ipsum sunt tempor enim cupidatat labore sunt. Dolore minim ut consequat reprehenderit. Non aute veniam occaecat aliquip. Consequat ullamco duis laboris do qui non. Magna minim mollit cillum reprehenderit. Cillum incididunt dolor do dolore cillum minim. Lorem ad nostrud veniam dolor aute qui.

Official source

https://mediaspace.epfl.ch/media/0_dku0fusv

About this result

This page is automatically generated and may contain information that is not correct, complete, up-to-date, or relevant to your search query. The same applies to every other page on this website. Please make sure to verify the information with EPFL's official sources.

Ontological neighbourhood

Statistics

Data collection: Experiment

Related lectures (33)