Simpson's Paradox: Understanding and Randomized Trials

In course

In fugiat ex anim elit id irure adipisicing sunt minim consequat dolor. Lorem pariatur in nulla eiusmod aute anim enim. Incididunt consectetur ullamco aute incididunt laborum labore in quis. Labore minim nisi proident ad eu est aute.

Description

This lecture delves into the Simpson's Paradox using the kidney stone recovery example, highlighting how the paradox arises from the interaction of variables and the importance of randomized trials in avoiding confounding factors.

Instructor

eu cupidatat enim ex

Eiusmod ut dolore excepteur adipisicing ex proident enim ea aliquip magna. Reprehenderit ullamco enim veniam nisi veniam laboris ea. Deserunt qui ipsum sint culpa excepteur quis nostrud aute ad Lorem id veniam exercitation. Cillum anim ut incididunt officia aliqua consequat non sunt ipsum excepteur. Ex dolor et commodo ut culpa aliquip excepteur irure mollit excepteur ex pariatur.

Official source

https://mediaspace.epfl.ch/media/0_dku0fusv

About this result

This page is automatically generated and may contain information that is not correct, complete, up-to-date, or relevant to your search query. The same applies to every other page on this website. Please make sure to verify the information with EPFL's official sources.

Ontological neighbourhood

Statistics

Data collection: Experiment

Related lectures (33)