Summary
In abstract algebra, the split-quaternions or coquaternions form an algebraic structure introduced by James Cockle in 1849 under the latter name. They form an associative algebra of dimension four over the real numbers. After introduction in the 20th century of coordinate-free definitions of rings and algebras, it was proved that the algebra of split-quaternions is isomorphic to the ring of the 2×2 real matrices. So the study of split-quaternions can be reduced to the study of real matrices, and this may explain why there are few mentions of split-quaternions in the mathematical literature of the 20th and 21st centuries. The split-quaternions are the linear combinations (with real coefficients) of four basis elements 1, i, j, k that satisfy the following product rules: i2 = −1, j2 = 1, k2 = 1, ij = k = −ji. By associativity, these relations imply jk = −i = −kj, ki = j = −ik, and also ijk = 1. So, the split-quaternions form a real vector space of dimension four with as a basis. They form also a noncommutative ring, by extending the above product rules by distributivity to all split-quaternions. Let consider the square matrices They satisfy the same multiplication table as the corresponding split-quaternions. As these matrices form a basis of the two by two matrices, the function that maps 1, i, j, k to (respectively) induces an algebra isomorphism from the split-quaternions to the two by two real matrices. The above multiplication rules imply that the eight elements 1, i, j, k, −1, −i, −j, −k form a group under this multiplication, which is isomorphic to the dihedral group D4, the symmetry group of a square. In fact, if one considers a square whose vertices are the points whose coordinates are 0 or 1, the matrix is the clockwise rotation of the quarter of a turn, is the symmetry around the first diagonal, and is the symmetry around the x axis. Like the quaternions introduced by Hamilton in 1843, they form a four dimensional real associative algebra.
About this result
This page is automatically generated and may contain information that is not correct, complete, up-to-date, or relevant to your search query. The same applies to every other page on this website. Please make sure to verify the information with EPFL's official sources.
Ontological neighbourhood