Symbiosis | EPFL Graph Search

Symbiosis (from Greek συμβίωσις, symbíōsis, "living together", from σύν, sýn, "together", and βίωσις, bíōsis, "living") is any type of a close and long-term biological interaction between two biological organisms of different species, termed symbionts, be it mutualistic, commensalistic, or parasitic. In 1879, Heinrich Anton de Bary defined it as "the living together of unlike organisms". The term is sometimes used in the more restricted sense of a mutually beneficial interaction in which both symbionts contribute to each other's support. Symbiosis can be obligatory, which means that one or more of the symbionts depend on each other for survival, or facultative (optional), when they can generally live independently. Symbiosis is also classified by physical attachment. When symbionts form a single body it is called conjunctive symbiosis, while all other arrangements are called disjunctive symbiosis. When one organism lives on the surface of another, such as head lice

Co-culture of microalgae and bacteria for wastewater treatment

Thierry Mounir

To address the problem of insucient wastewater treatment and eutrophication of lakes and rivers, the symbiotic association of microalgae and bacteria has shown great potential and numerous advantages. First, co-cultures can exhibit ecient treatment of domestic wastewater, with the combination of high nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus) removal abilities of the microalgae and ecient degradation of organic matter by bacteria. Second, the symbiosis between microalgae and bacteria exchanging CO2 and O2 makes aeration not necessary, thus signicantly reducing the operating costs of the wastewater treatment plant. Third, recovered biomass of algae could be used as highpro t products like biofuels and food source. Fourth, the xation of the atmospheric CO2 by the microalgae through photosynthesis would contribute to greenhouse gas reduction in the atmosphere. Finally, the decayed microalgal biomass could serve as organic carbon source for denitrication by bacteria. However, this technology is not well-known yet, and further research on the in uence of the operating parameters have to be conducted. Furthermore, its main drawback is the harvesting of the microalgae. Due to their small size, microalgae demonstrate a low settling rate of 3.6 x 10􀀀3 m/h. A solution is to enhance aggregation of the biomass through occulation, followed by granulation to reach fully-developed microalgal-bacterial consortia. These granules exhibit high treatment performances and high settleability. The rst objective of this project was to identify the optimal microalgae:bacteria ratio for COD and nutrients removal. The second objective was to form fully-developed granules, starting from a co-culture, and assess the in uence of dierent agitation speeds on the granulation. The photobioreactor with a microalgae:bacteria ratio of 75:25 expressed the most promising results in COD removal eciency (95% after 8 days), nitrogen removal eciency (94% after 9 days), phosphorus removal eciency (93% after 7 days), and biomass productivity (144 mg/L/d). In this photobioreactor, nitrogen was removed by a combination of assimilation into microalgal biomass and nitrication/denitrication by the bacteria. The COD was removed by degradation by bacteria and mixotrophic microalgae that used the organic matter as carbon source. Finally, phosphorus was removed by assimilation into microalgal biomass. Although obvious aggregation between microalgae and bacteria could be observed, no fully-developed granules were formed after 89 batches of 24 hours. Because of low COD and nitrogen removals, no starvation period was experienced by the co-cultures. Therefore, extracellular polymeric substances were not released in sucient amounts to enhance the granulation. Furthermore, excessive stirring (200 rpm) may have lead to microalgal cells damage, thus promoting bacterial growth over microalgal growth. On the other hand, slower agitation speeds (80 and 120 rpm) seemed to enhance microalgal growth. Overall, the agitation speed appeared to have an indirect impact on the treatment performances and the settleability of the co-cultures, by signicantly in uencing the microalgal and bacterial growths.

2020

Antioxidant responses to heat and light stress differ with habitat in a common reef coral

Thomas Krüger

Coral bleaching—the stress-induced collapse of the coral–Symbiodinium symbiosis—is a significant driver of worldwide coral reef degradation. Yet, not all corals are equally susceptible to bleaching, and we lack a clear understanding of the mechanisms underpinning their differential susceptibilities. Here, we focus on cellular redox regulation as a potential determinant of bleaching susceptibility in the reef coral Stylophora pistillata. Using slow heating (1 °C d−1) and altered irradiance, we induced bleaching in S. pistillata colonies sampled from two depths [5–8 m (shallow) and 15–18 m (deep)]. There was significant depth-dependent variability in the timing and extent of bleaching (loss of symbiont cells), as well as in host enzymatic antioxidant activity [specifically, superoxide dismutase and catalase (CAT)]. However, among the coral fragments that bleached, most did so without displaying any evidence of a host enzymatic antioxidant response. For example, both deep and shallow corals suffered significant symbiont loss at elevated temperature, but only deep colonies exposed to high temperature and high light displayed any up-regulation of host antioxidant enzyme activity (CAT). Surprisingly, this preceded the equivalent antioxidant responses of the symbiont, which raises questions about the source(s) of hydrogen peroxide in the symbiosis. Overall, changes in enzymatic antioxidant activity in the symbionts were driven primarily by irradiance rather than temperature, and responses were similar across depth groups. Taken together, our results suggest that in the absence of light stress, heating of 1 °C d−1 to 4 °C above ambient is not sufficient to induce a substantial oxidative challenge in S. pistillata. We provide some of the first evidence that regulation of coral enzymatic antioxidants can vary significantly depending on habitat, and, in terms of determining bleaching susceptibility, our results suggest a significant role for the host’s differential regulation of cellular redox status.

Springer Verlag2015