Are you an EPFL student looking for a semester project?
Work with us on data science and visualisation projects, and deploy your project as an app on top of Graph Search.
Concept
Axiom of extensionality
Summary
In axiomatic set theory and the branches of logic, mathematics, and computer science that use it, the axiom of extensionality, or axiom of extension, is one of the axioms of Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory. It says that sets having the same elements are the same set.
In the formal language of the Zermelo–Fraenkel axioms, the axiom reads:
or in words:
Given any set A and any set B, if for every set X, X is a member of A if and only if X is a member of B, then A is equal to B.
(It is not really essential that X here be a set — but in ZF, everything is. See Ur-elements below for when this is violated.)
The converse, of this axiom follows from the substitution property of equality.
To understand this axiom, note that the clause in parentheses in the symbolic statement above simply states that A and B have precisely the same members.
Thus, what the axiom is really saying is that two sets are equal if and only if they have precisely the same members.
The essence of this is:
A set is determined uniquely by its members.
The axiom of extensionality can be used with any statement of the form
where P is any unary predicate that does not mention A, to define a unique set whose members are precisely the sets satisfying the predicate .
We can then introduce a new symbol for ; it's in this way that definitions in ordinary mathematics ultimately work when their statements are reduced to purely set-theoretic terms.
The axiom of extensionality is generally uncontroversial in set-theoretical foundations of mathematics, and it or an equivalent appears in just about any alternative axiomatisation of set theory.
However, it may require modifications for some purposes, as below.
The axiom given above assumes that equality is a primitive symbol in predicate logic.
Some treatments of axiomatic set theory prefer to do without this, and instead treat the above statement not as an axiom but as a definition of equality.
Then it is necessary to include the usual axioms of equality from predicate logic as axioms about this defined symbol.
Official source
About this result
This page is automatically generated and may contain information that is not correct, complete, up-to-date, or relevant to your search query. The same applies to every other page on this website. Please make sure to verify the information with EPFL's official sources.