Are you an EPFL student looking for a semester project?
Work with us on data science and visualisation projects, and deploy your project as an app on top of Graph Search.
Five different types of β-diketiminate ligands, bearing electron-donating to strongly electron-withdrawing substituents, were synthesized and used in the synthesis of Cp* ruthenium complexes (Cp* = η5-C5Me5). One series consists of complexes with a covalent RuIII–Cl bond, and the other series features a reduced RuII center, where the chloride is abstracted by treatment of the corresponding RuIII compounds with Zn or Mg. All compounds were characterized by single-crystal X-ray diffraction, UV–visible spectroscopy, and cyclic voltammetry. In the case of RuII complexes, solution NMR techniques provided key information regarding the electronic and structural differences induced by the different β-diketiminate ligands employed. Capitalizing on the facile reduction–oxidation cycle of the Cp* ruthenium β-diketiminato complexes, catalytic atom transfer radical addition (ATRA) and cyclization (ATRC) reactions were performed on relevant substrates. The turnover rates are strongly dependent on the type of β-diketiminate used, where ligands with electron-withdrawing substituents, i.e., trifluoromethyl groups, provided complexes that efficiently catalyze the addition of CCl4 or toluenesulfonyl chloride to styrene. In contrast, complexes with electron-donating substituents on the β-diketiminate promoted efficient ATR cyclization of N-allyl-N-phenyltrichloroacetamide and 2,2,2-trichloroethyl ether. Thus, the overall product conversion and yield are dependent on matching the ligand substitution pattern of the catalyst to the type of substrate.
Paul Joseph Dyson, Lucinda Kate Batchelor, Silvia Schoch