Strict scrutinyIn U.S. constitutional law, when a law infringes upon a fundamental constitutional right, the court may apply the strict scrutiny standard. Strict scrutiny holds the challenged law as presumptively invalid unless the government can demonstrate that the law or regulation is necessary to achieve a "compelling state interest". The government must also demonstrate that the law is "narrowly tailored" to achieve that compelling purpose, and that it uses the "least restrictive means" to achieve that purpose.
Rational basis reviewIn U.S. constitutional law, rational basis review is the normal standard of review that courts apply when considering constitutional questions, including due process or equal protection questions under the Fifth Amendment or Fourteenth Amendment. Courts applying rational basis review seek to determine whether a law is "rationally related" to a "legitimate" government interest, whether real or hypothetical. The higher levels of scrutiny are intermediate scrutiny and strict scrutiny.
Droit au respect de la vie privéedroite|vignette| Le respect de la vie privée peut être limitée par la surveillance – dans ce cas par la vidéosurveillance. Le droit à la vie privée est un élément juridique qui vise à protéger le respect de la vie privée des individus. Plus de 150 constitutions nationales mentionnent le droit à la vie privée. Le , l'assemblée générale des Nations Unies adopte la Déclaration universelle des droits de l'homme (DUDH) rédigée à l'origine pour garantir les droits individuels de chacun, en tout lieu.
