In psychology, aversives are unpleasant stimuli that induce changes in behavior via negative reinforcement or positive punishment. By applying an aversive immediately before or after a behavior the likelihood of the target behavior occurring in the future is reduced. Aversives can vary from being slightly unpleasant or irritating to physically, psychologically and/or emotionally damaging. It is not the level of unpleasantness or intention that defines something as an aversive, but rather the level of effectiveness the unpleasant event has on changing (decreasing) behavior.
Classical conditioning
There are two types of aversive stimuli:
Unconditioned aversive stimuli naturally result in pain or discomfort and are often associated with biologically harmful or damaging substances or events. Examples include extreme heat or cold, bitter flavors, electric shocks, loud noises and pain. Aversives can be applied naturally (such as touching a hot stove) or in a contrived manner (such as during torture or behavior modification).
A conditioned aversive stimulus is an initially neutral stimulus that becomes aversive after repeated pairing with an unconditioned aversive stimulus. This type of stimulus would include consequences such as verbal warnings, gestures or even the sight of an individual who is disliked.
Operant conditioning and Ethical challenges to autism treatment
Aversives may be used as punishment or negative reinforcement during applied behavior analysis. In early years, the use of aversives was represented as a less restrictive alternative to the methods used in mental institutions such as shock treatment, hydrotherapy, straitjacketing and frontal lobotomies. Early iterations of the Lovaas technique incorporated aversives, though Lovaas later abandoned their use. Over time the use of aversives has become less common, though they are still in use as of 2021.
Several national and international disability rights groups have spoken against the use of aversive therapies, including TASH and Autism National Committee (known as AUTCOM).
Cette page est générée automatiquement et peut contenir des informations qui ne sont pas correctes, complètes, à jour ou pertinentes par rapport à votre recherche. Il en va de même pour toutes les autres pages de ce site. Veillez à vérifier les informations auprès des sources officielles de l'EPFL.
L'analyse du comportement appliquée, siglée ABA, en anglais Applied Behavior Analysis, se définit comme la science dans laquelle les techniques dérivées du béhaviorisme sont appliquées systématiquement afin d'améliorer des comportements socialement significatifs, et dans laquelle l'expérimentation est utilisée pour identifier les variables explicatives du comportement. L'analyse appliquée du comportement a remplacé la modification du comportement » (behavior modification) car cette dernière approche tentait de changer le comportement sans clarifier les interactions sous-jacentes avec l'environnement.
In operant conditioning, punishment is any change in a human or animal's surroundings which, occurring after a given behavior or response, reduces the likelihood of that behavior occurring again in the future. As with reinforcement, it is the behavior, not the human/animal, that is punished. Whether a change is or is not punishing is determined by its effect on the rate that the behavior occurs. This is called motivating operations (MO), because they alter the effectiveness of a stimulus.
vignette|thumbtime=192|L'expérience du petit Albert. Le conditionnement classique (aussi appelé conditionnement répondant, conditionnement de type I ou conditionnement pavlovien) est proposé par Ivan Pavlov en 1903. La publication de son livre « Conditioned Reflexes: an Investigation of the Psysiological Activity of the Cerebral Cortex » en 1927 a laissé un impact majeur sur le développement de la psychologie. Cette théorie s'intéresse aux résultats d'un apprentissage dû à l'association entre des stimuli de l'environnement et les réactions inconditionnelles de l'organisme.
Animals must learn from past experiences, to adapt their behavior to an ever-changing environment. Students will learn about the neuronal circuit mechanisms of reward-based learning, and of aversively
Explore les économies d'énergie dans les collisions, en mettant l'accent sur les forces non conservatrices et conservatrices, le centre de masse et les types de collisions.
Aversively-motivated associative learning allows animals to avoid harm and thus ensures survival. Aversive learning can be studied by the fear learning paradigm, in which an innocuous sensory stimulus like a tone (conditioned stimulus, CS), acquires a nega ...
EPFL2023
, ,
During fear learning, defensive behaviors like freezing need to be finely balanced in the presence or absence of threat-predicting cues (conditioned stimulus, CS). Nevertheless, the circuits underlying such balancing are largely unknown. Here, we investiga ...
eLIFE SCIENCES PUBL LTD2023
,
The different receptors in human skin show not only diversity in the stimuli to which they respond, but also variable sensitivity and directionality. This is often determined by their location or morphology, and can play an important role in filtering or a ...