État de surface (mécanique)

Résumé

En mécanique, l'état de surface est un élément de cotation d'une pièce indiquant la fonction, la rugosité, et l'aspect des surfaces usinées. Fonctions de surface En Spécification Géométrique des Produits (GPS), on distingue seize fonctions principales que peut remplir la surface d'une pièce mécanique : Surface de contact avec une autre pièce :

frottement de glissement lubrifié (FG) ;
frottement à sec (FS) ;
frottement de roulement (FR) ;
frottement fluide (FF) ;
résistance au matage (RM) ;
étanchéité dynamique avec ou sans joint (ED) ;
étanchéité statique avec ou sans joint (ES) ;
ajustement fixe avec contrainte (AC) ;
adhérence, collage (AD). Surface libre, indépendante :
générée par la coupe d'un outil (OC) ;
générée par un outil de forme (pliage, repoussage, chaudronnerie) ;
générée par un outil abrasif (chaudronnerie, polissage, ponçage, serrurerie) ;
générée par un outil découpant (chaudronnerie, découpage jet d'eau, découpe laser, découp

Source officielle

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%89tat_de_surface_(m%C3%A9canique)

À propos de ce résultat

Cette page est générée automatiquement et peut contenir des informations qui ne sont pas correctes, complètes, à jour ou pertinentes par rapport à votre recherche. Il en va de même pour toutes les autres pages de ce site. Veillez à vérifier les informations auprès des sources officielles de l'EPFL.

Publications associées (100)

Chargement

Afficher plus

Publications associées

Chargement

Personnes associées (24)

Personnes associées

Chargement

Unités associées (16)

Unités associées

Chargement

Concepts associés (7)

Concepts associés

Chargement

Cours associés (36)

Cours associés

Chargement

Séances de cours associées (68)

Séances de cours associées

Chargement

Publications associées (100)

Characterization of the surface roughness of 3d objects from micro CT

David Delévaux

2020

Chargement

Thermal Modelling and Experimental Validation in the Perspective of Tool Steel Laser Polishing

Eric Boillat, Alexandre Masserey, Bastian Meylan

Laser polishing (LP) is a process that allows a significant reduction of the surface roughness of a metal workpiece via re-melting a shallow layer of material. However, the practical use of LP is limited due to the difficulty of satisfying the high surface polishing quality for industries such as jewelry. Hence, this study presents a thermal model based on the Chernoff formula for fixed and moving LP processes. The model was validated via a sensitivity analysis of the coefficient of absorption of the solid and liquid phase and through comparing the results with the corresponding experimental observations of the melt pools produced. In this investigation, a continuous wave, high power diode laser (980 nm wavelength, o 0.9 mm spot size with a flat top distribution) was coupled to a fixed focusing head. The material was a hardened tool steel (X38CrMVo5-1 steel-1.2343) with an initial surface state obtained by electrical discharge machining (EDM) of CH30 on the Charmilles scale for EDM, which corresponds to a roughness Ra of 3.15 mu m. The results show that the model is able to represent the thermal behavior of the tool steel during LP. The best results are obtained with two constant coefficients, one for the solid based on the measurement at room temperature (a(s) = 35%) and one for the liquid fixed so that the model fits the experiment data (a(l) = 25%).

MDPI2022

Chargement

Variational phase-ﬁeld study of adhesive wear: elastic and elastic-plastic models

Sylvain Collet

Wear is well known for causing material loss in a sliding interface. Available macroscopic approaches are bound to empirical ﬁtting parameters. We propose a study of the physical processes that lead to wear at the scale of the surface roughness, where adhesive junctions are formed between the asperities on the surface of the materials. Using a brittle formulation of the variational phase-ﬁeld approach to fracture, we demonstrate that the failure mechanism of an adhesive junction can be linked to its geometry. By imposing speciﬁc couplings between the damage and the elastic energy, we further investigate the triggering processes underlying each failure mechanism. We show that a large debris formation is mostly triggered by tensile stresses while shear stresses are dominating the mechanisms leading to small or no particle formation. The interaction of two neighboring junctions is analyzed and shows that macro-particles which embody the two junctions can be formed under certain conditions. A ductile phase-ﬁeld formulation permits us to assess the effect of the material’s ductility on the failure mechanism of adhesive junctions. We observe that the formation of large particle becomes less likely to happen as the ductility of the material increases.

2020

Chargement

Afficher plus