In economics, the excess burden of taxation, also known as the deadweight cost or deadweight loss of taxation, is one of the economic losses that society suffers as the result of taxes or subsidies. Economic theory posits that distortions change the amount and type of economic behavior from that which would occur in a free market without the tax. Excess burdens can be measured using the average cost of funds or the marginal cost of funds (MCF). Excess burdens were first discussed by Adam Smith.
An equivalent kind of inefficiency can also be caused by subsidies (which technically can be viewed as taxes with negative rates).
Economic losses due to taxes have been evaluated to be as low as 2.5 cents per dollar of revenue, and as high as 30 cents per dollar of revenue (on average), and even much higher at the margins.
The cost of a distortion is usually measured as the amount that would have to be paid to the people affected by its supply, the greater the excess burden. The second is the tax rate: as a general rule, the excess burden of a tax increases with the square of the tax rate.
The average cost of funds is the total cost of distortions divided by the total revenue collected by a government. In contrast, the marginal cost of funds (MCF) is the size of the distortion that accompanied the last unit of revenue raised (i.e. the rate of change of distortion with respect to revenue). In most cases, the MCF increases as the amount of tax collected increases.
A common position in economics is that the costs in a cost-benefit analysis for any tax-funded project should be increased according to the marginal cost of funds, because that is close to the deadweight loss that will be experienced if the project is added to the budget, or to the deadweight loss removed if the project is removed from the budget.
In the case of progressive taxes, the distortionary effects of a tax may be accompanied by other benefits: the redistribution of dollars from wealthier people to poorer people who could possibly obtain more benefit from them - in effect reducing economic inequalities and improving GDP growth.
Cette page est générée automatiquement et peut contenir des informations qui ne sont pas correctes, complètes, à jour ou pertinentes par rapport à votre recherche. Il en va de même pour toutes les autres pages de ce site. Veillez à vérifier les informations auprès des sources officielles de l'EPFL.
This course provides students with a working knowledge of macroeconomic models that explicitly incorporate financial markets. The goal is to develop a broad and analytical framework for analyzing the
The course allows students to get familiarized with the basic tools and concepts of modern microeconomic analysis. Based on graphical reasoning and analytical calculus, it constantly links to real eco
In economics, the excess burden of taxation, also known as the deadweight cost or deadweight loss of taxation, is one of the economic losses that society suffers as the result of taxes or subsidies. Economic theory posits that distortions change the amount and type of economic behavior from that which would occur in a free market without the tax. Excess burdens can be measured using the average cost of funds or the marginal cost of funds (MCF). Excess burdens were first discussed by Adam Smith.
La théorie de la taxation optimale est un ensemble de théories économiques qui dégagent des règles permettant au système de taxation de minimiser les distorsions et les inefficacités économiques. Les taxes générèrent des distorsions économiques car les agents économiques réagissent et modifient leur comportement. Par exemple, une taxe sur le travail peut inciter les individus à travailler moins qu'ils ne le désireraient, ou même de renoncer à un emploi.
En économie, l'incidence fiscale est l'analyse de la répartition de la charge effective de l'impôt entre les différents agents économiques. Elle part du postulat que le coût de l'impôt se répercute sur les prix et que donc celui qui supporte effectivement le coût de l’impôt est indépendant de celui qui est légalement tenu d'en verser le montant à l'administration fiscale. Pour les physiocrates ou Henry George tous les revenus provenaient de la terre, et donc la charge de l'impôt pesait in fine sur la propriété foncière, thèse contredite par exemple par Nicolas-François Canard.
Plonge dans le paysage économique et budgétaire en analysant la production potentielle, l’orientation budgétaire, la dette publique et les effets des chocs sur les dépenses publiques.