In law, the venue is the location where a case is heard.
The perceived abuse of English criminal venue law was one of the enumerated grievances in the United States Declaration of Independence, which accused George III of the United Kingdom of "transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offenses." Article Three of the United States Constitution provides: "Trial of all Crimes . . . shall be held in the State where the said Crimes shall have been committed; but when not committed within any State, the Trial shall be at such Place or Places as the Congress may by Law have directed."
The "where the said Crimes shall have been committed" language refers to the locus delicti, and a single crime may often give rise to several constitutionally permissible venues. "[T]he locus delicti must be determined from the nature of the crime alleged and the location of the act or acts constituting it." Thus, venue may be constitutionally permissible even if an individual defendant was never personally present in the relevant state. For example, conspiracy may be prosecuted wherever the agreement occurred or wherever any overt act was committed.
For the purposes of constitutional venue, the boundaries of the states are questions of law to be determined by the judge, but the location of the crime is a question of fact to be determined by the jury.
The venue provision of Article III (regulating the location of the trial) is distinct from the Vicinage Clause of the Sixth Amendment (regulating the geography from which the jury pool is selected). The unit of the former is the state; the unit of the later is the state and judicial district. Unlike judicial districts under the Vicinage Clause, consistent with Article III, Congress may "provide a place of trial where none was provided when the offense was committed, or change the place of trial after the commission of the offense."
Venue is either a county (for cases in state court) or a district or division (for cases in federal court).
Cette page est générée automatiquement et peut contenir des informations qui ne sont pas correctes, complètes, à jour ou pertinentes par rapport à votre recherche. Il en va de même pour toutes les autres pages de ce site. Veillez à vérifier les informations auprès des sources officielles de l'EPFL.
Le forum shopping (en français, élection de juridiction) est une pratique de droit international privé qui consiste à saisir la juridiction la plus susceptible de donner raison à ses propres intérêts. Les différences entre les droits privés du monde ont pour conséquence que certains pays disposent de lois très protectrices envers les consommateurs ou les producteurs, tandis que d'autres ont des corpus juridiques plus faibles.
In contract law, a forum selection clause (sometimes called a dispute resolution clause, choice of court clause, governing law clause, jurisdiction clause or an arbitration clause, depending upon its form) in a contract with a conflict of laws element allows the parties to agree that any disputes relating to that contract will be resolved in a specific forum. They usually operate in conjunction with a choice of law clause which determines the proper law of the relevant contract.
En droit, une poursuite est une action en justice intentée contre une personne. Le terme est généralement utilisé dans un contexte de droit pénal. En droit civil, on favorisera le terme « action civile » (plutôt que poursuite civile). En Suisse, l'expression « mettre aux poursuites » signifie intenter une action ayant pour objet une somme d'argent ou des sûretés à fournir dans le cas d'une dette. L'action se fait sur la base de la loi fédérale sur la poursuite pour dettes et la faillite (abrégée LP).