Activation of the unfolded protein response is required for defenses against bacterial pore-forming toxin in vivo

Pore-forming toxins (PFTs) constitute the single largest class of proteinaceous bacterial virulence factors and are made by many of the most important bacterial pathogens. Host responses to these toxins are complex and poorly understood. We find that the endoplasmic reticulum unfolded protein response (UPR) is activated upon exposure to PFTs both in Caenorhabditis elegans and in mammalian cells. Activation of the UPR is protective in vivo against PFTs since animals that lack either the ire-1-xbp-1 or the atf-6 arms of the UPR are more sensitive to PFT than wild-type animals. The UPR acts directly in the cells targeted by the PFT. Loss of the UPR leads to a normal response against unrelated toxins or a pathogenic bacterium, indicating its PFT-protective role is specific. The p38 mitogen-activated protein (MAPK) kinase pathway has been previously shown to be important for cellular defenses against PFTs. We find here that the UPR is one of the key downstream targets of the p38 MAPK pathway in response to PFT since loss of a functional p38 MAPK pathway leads to a failure of PFT to properly activate the ire-1-xbp-1 arm of the UPR. The UPR-mediated activation and response to PFTs is distinct from the canonical UPR-mediated response to unfolded proteins both in terms of its activation and functional sensitivities. These data demonstrate that the UPR, a fundamental intracellular pathway, can operate in intrinsic cellular defenses against bacterial attack.

The contribution of the host stress response to the pathogenesis of Pseudomonas entomophila in the Drosophila intestine

Sveta Chakrabarti

Recently, several studies done in Drosophila have revealed that efficient and rapid recovery from bacterial infection in the gut is possible only when bacterial clearance by the immune system is coordinated with repair through renewal of the epithelium damaged by infection. In this thesis, I have analyzed how the entomopathogenic bacterium Pseudomonas entomophila affects the immune response and epithelium renewal. A microarray analysis first showed that P. entomophila is recognized by the Drosophila immune system since ingestion of this bacterium stimulated the expression of antimicrobial peptide genes by the Imd pathway. In addition, stress and damage related pathways were strongly induced by P. entomophila, which correlate with its capacity to inflict severe damage. While antibacterial genes were induced in the gut following infection with P. entomophila, the immune response was not productive due to a general inhibition of translation that affected all the newly synthesized transcripts. Furthermore, the blockage of translation also inhibited the repair program by blocking the production of JAK-STAT ligands (upd3, upd2) and growth factors, which stimulate the intestinal stem cells proliferation and differentiation. I next analyzed the pathways that link cellular damage to reduction of translation. Using a genetic approach, I showed that inhibition of translation was induced by two signaling pathways: i) the phosphorylation of elongation initiation factor 2α (eIF2α) by the stress kinase GCN2 and ii) the inhibition of the TOR pathway by the AMPK kinase. Both kinases sense metabolic deprivation, suggesting that cellular damages induced by P. entomophila induce a state of “starvation”. Inhibition of translation is usually an adaptive cellular response to adjust the metabolism to the energy status of the cells. The observation that GCN2-deficient flies survived better than wild-type flies to P. entomophila indicates that pathogenesis is linked to an over-activation of stress pathways that usually help to endure the consequence of an infection. In this in vivo model of infection, I also showed that the reduction of translation was a consequence of cellular damage to the intestine caused by host-derived reactive oxygen species (through the activity of Duox) and by the direct action of a pore-forming toxin produced by the pathogen. As a consequence of this translational arrest, flies succumbed P. entomophila infection because they were unable to repair gut damage. Finally, I showed that inhibition of translation also had a strong influence on innate immune responses observed upon P. entomophila infection. The specific activation of a systemic immune response (antimicrobial peptides produced by the fat body) observed upon P. entomophila infection could be recapitulated by feeding flies with a non-lethal pathogen and an inhibitor of translation. Hence, I showed translation inhibition could be an important feature that shapes the immune response. The p38 MAPK family is involved in stress and immunity in both mammals and Drosophila. In Drosophila, three p38-MAPK-encoding genes, p38a, p38b and p38c, have been identified but their function in the gut immune response is poorly characterized. In the second part of my thesis, I have analyzed the role of these three p38 MAPKs in Drosophila intestinal immunity, especially p38c, which is strongly enriched in the gut. I first confirmed that the three p38 are involved kinases are involved in the defense to oral infection with pathogenic (but non-lethal) bacteria such as Erwinia carotovora 15. Surprisingly, p38c mutant flies were more resistant to P. entomophila and did not show the reduction in translation observed in wild-type flies. Interestingly, the transcription of the ROS producing enzyme Duox was reduced in p38c raising the hypothesis that p38 contributes to P. entomophila pathogenicity by activating Duox. Furthermore, I have obtained preliminary data indicating that p38c and the transcription factor ATF-3 act in the same pathway contributing the host immune response and lipid metabolism. Together, my thesis reveals the complex cross-talks between stress and immune pathways during microbial infection. While, it shows that stress pathways usually contribute to endure the damage caused by infection, excessive activation of these pathways can contribute to pathogenesis.

EPFL2013

The role of the inflammasome in cellular responses to toxins and bacterial effectors

Françoise Gisou van der Goot Grunberg

Invading pathogens are recognized by mammalian cells through dedicated receptors found either at the cell surface or in the cytoplasm. These receptors, like the trans-membrane Toll-like Receptors (TLR) or the cytosolic Nod-like Receptors (NLR), initiate innate immunity after recognition of molecular patterns found in bacteria or viruses, such as LPS, flagellin, or double-stranded RNA. Recognition of molecules produced only by a specific pathogen, such as a viral envelop protein or a bacterial adhesin does not appear to occur. Bacterial protein toxins, however, might compose an intermediate class. Considering the diversity of toxins in terms of structure, it is unlikely that cells respond to them via specific molecular recognition. It rather appears that different classes of toxins trigger cellular changes that are sensed by the cells as danger signals, such as changes in cellular ion composition after membrane perforation by pore-forming toxins or type III secretion systems. The signaling pathways triggered through toxin-induced cell alterations will likely play a role in modulating host responses to virulent bacteria. We will here describe the few studied cases in which detection of the toxin by the host cell was addressed. The review will include not only toxins but also bacteria effectors secreted by the bacterium in to the host cell cytoplasm.

Springer-Verlag2007

Pore-forming toxins and cellular non-immune defenses (CNIDs)

Françoise Gisou van der Goot Grunberg

Pore-forming toxins (PFTs) are the most common class of bacterial protein toxin and are important for bacterial pathogenesis. Recent studies have shown that the previous model stating that epithelial cells lyse in response to these toxins and have no defenses against these pores is oversimplified. Rather, it appears that cells have sophisticated mechanisms and signal-transduction pathways with which to respond to such an attack. There is a growing body of knowledge about how cells respond to and protect themselves against PFTs; this protection against PFTs is likely to be important in host survival to attack by bacterial pathogens, but does not neatly fit into current concepts of adaptive or innate immunity. Therefore, it is proposed that the terminology cellular non-immune defenses (CNIDs) be used to describe defenses that are employed by non-immune cells to protect against bacterial attack.

Elsevier2007

The contribution of the host stress response to the pathogenesis of Pseudomonas entomophila in the Drosophila intestine

Sveta Chakrabarti

EPFL2013