Summary
Carbon pricing (or pricing) is a method for nations to address climate change. The cost is applied to greenhouse gas emissions in order to encourage polluters to reduce the combustion of coal, oil and gas – the main driver of climate change. The method is widely agreed and considered to be efficient. Carbon pricing seeks to address the economic problem that emissions of and other greenhouse gases (GHG) are a negative externality – a detrimental product that is not charged for by any market. A carbon price usually takes the form of a carbon tax or a Cap and Trade system (generally via an emissions trading scheme (ETS)), a requirement to purchase allowances to emit. 21.7% of global GHG emissions are covered by carbon pricing in 2021, a major increase due to the introduction of the Chinese national carbon trading scheme. Regions with carbon pricing include most European countries and Canada. On the other hand, top emitters like India, Russia, the Gulf states and many US states have not yet introduced carbon pricing. Australia had a carbon pricing scheme from 2012 to 2014. In 2020, carbon pricing generated 53bninrevenue.AccordingtotheIntergovernmentalPanelonClimateChange,apricelevelof53bn in revenue. According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, a price level of 135–5500 in 2030 and 24513,000pertonin2050wouldbeneededtodrivecarbonemissionstostaybelowthe1.5°Climit.Latestmodelsofthesocialcostofcarboncalculateadamageofmorethan245–13,000 per ton in 2050 would be needed to drive carbon emissions to stay below the 1.5°C limit. Latest models of the social cost of carbon calculate a damage of more than 3000/t as a result of economy feedbacks and falling global GDP growth rates, while policy recommendations range from about 50to50 to 200. Many carbon pricing schemes including the ETS in China remain below 10/t.OneexceptionistheEuropeanUnionEmissionsTradingSystem(EUETS)whichexceeded100/t(10/t. One exception is the European Union Emissions Trading System (EU-ETS) which exceeded 100€/t () in February 2023. A carbon tax is generally favoured on economic grounds for its simplicity and stability, while cap-and-trade theoretically offers the possibility to limit allowances to the remaining carbon budget. Current implementations are only designed to meet certain reduction targets.
About this result
This page is automatically generated and may contain information that is not correct, complete, up-to-date, or relevant to your search query. The same applies to every other page on this website. Please make sure to verify the information with EPFL's official sources.