Lipid bilayer phase behavior | EPFL Graph Search

One property of a lipid bilayer is the relative mobility (fluidity) of the individual lipid molecules and how this mobility changes with temperature. This response is known as the phase behavior of the bilayer. Broadly, at a given temperature a lipid bilayer can exist in either a liquid or a solid phase. The solid phase is commonly referred to as a “gel” phase. All lipids have a characteristic temperature at which they undergo a transition (melt) from the gel to liquid phase. In both phases the lipid molecules are constrained to the two dimensional plane of the membrane, but in liquid phase bilayers the molecules diffuse freely within this plane. Thus, in a liquid bilayer a given lipid will rapidly exchange locations with its neighbor millions of times a second and will, through the process of a random walk, migrate over long distances. In contrast to this large in-plane mobility, it is very difficult for lipid molecules to flip-flop from one side of the lipid bilayer to the other. In a phosphatidylcholine-based bilayer this process typically occurs over a timescale of weeks. This discrepancy can be understood in terms of the basic structure of the bilayer. For a lipid to flip from one leaflet to the other, its hydrated headgroup must cross the hydrophobic core of the bilayer, an energetically unfavorable process. Unlike liquid phase bilayers, the lipids in a gel phase bilayer are locked in place and exhibit neither flip-flop nor lateral mobility. Due to this limited mobility, gel bilayers lack an important property of liquid bilayers: the ability to reseal small holes. Liquid phase bilayers can spontaneously heal small voids, much the same way a film of oil on water could flow in to fill a gap. This functionality is one of the reasons that cell membranes are usually composed of fluid phase bilayers. Motion constraints on lipids in lipid bilayers are also imposed by presence of proteins in biological membranes, especially so in the annular lipid shell 'attached' to surface of integral membrane proteins.

Structural characterisation and membrane insertion of M13 procoat, M13 coat and Pf3 coat proteins

Membrane proteins fulfill many central functions in the biological membrane. The insertion process of these proteins and their structure, which are intimately linked to their function, are not yet well understood. As a model we studied three proteins reconstituted into lipid bilayers (which serve as a model for the biological membrane): the major coat proteins of phages Pf3 and M13 and the precursor of the latter, M13 procoat protein, which spans the inner membrane two times and serves as a model for a multi-spanning membrane protein. Whereas Pf3 coat protein can insert into the membrane in its mature form, M13 coat protein needs the signal sequence present in the precursor to insert. A new, simple and efficient purification method has been developed for M13 procoat, M13 and Pf3 coat proteins. Homogenous preparations were obtained in isopropanol/0.l% TFA, where M13 coat protein is found to be dissolved in a monomeric form, and the two other proteins as dimers. The conformations of these particular proteins in different environments have been determined by circular dichroism and infrared spectroscopy. In organic solvents, the proteins adopt a conformation with an average helix content of 90%. In lipid bilayers composed of phospatidylcholine and phosphatidylglycerol lipids, the average helix content is 50% for M13 procoat protein, 60% for M13 coat protein and 75% for Pf3 coat protein. In order to characterize the orientational distribution the orientational order parameter Sα of the protein helices in planar lipid bilayers have been determined by polarized infrared measurements in the amide I spectral range. The helices of the three proteins are oriented preferentially parallel to the membrane normal, with Sα = 0.63 for M13 procoat protein, Sα = 0.58 for Pf3 coat protein and a distinctly higher value of Sα = 0.81 for M13 coat protein. The topology of M13 and Pf3 coat proteins was investigated using limited proteolysis in lipid vesicles with proteinase K combined with mass spectroscopy to analyze the lytic fragments. The C-terminal part of both proteins was found to be inaccessible to proteinase K, only 14 (Pf3) or 15 (M13) residues on the N-terminal were protease accessible from the outside of the vesicles. Furthermore, the standard free energy change, ΔGo, of a membrane-inserting protein with a leader sequence has been determined experimentally for the first time, using M13 procoat protein as an example. The partition coefficient for the distribution of this protein between the aqueous phase and the membrane phase of preformed lipid vesicles yielded a value of Γ = 6.5×105 M-1, corresponding to a ΔGo of -10.4 kcal/mol, based on measurements of the fluorescence energy transfer between the intrinsic tryptophan of the protein and a suitably labeled lipid membrane of POPC. For comparison, the partition coefficient of the M13 coat protein between the aqueous and the POPC lipid bilayer phase was determined to be distinctly lower: Γ = 1×105 M-1 (ΔGo = -9.3 kcal/mol). Proteinase K digestion experiments have been performed, showing that 20% of the procoat protein bound to lipid vesicles spontaneously integrate in a transbilayer form, whereas 80% remain inserted in the interfacial membrane region. By taking together these results, an upper limit for the free energy change of the transmembrane insertion of procoat protein was estimated to be -14.8 kcal/mol. In order to distinguish further the contribution arising from insertion of the procoat protein into the membrane interfacial region from that due to transmembrane insertion, the partition coefficient of a mutant procoat protein OM30R (which contains a positively charged amino acid in its mature hydrophobic segment (exchange of a Val to an Arg residue at position 30)) was determined, yielding Γ = 0.3×105 M-1 (ΔGo = -8.6 kcal/mol). Previously reported in vivo experiments have shown that the OM30R mutant protein is not translocated across Escherichia coli inner membrane, but only binds to the inner surface. The results presented here indicate that although the insertion of the procoat protein into the interfacial region of the lipid bilayer contributes the major part to ΔGo, it is the final energy gain of the interaction of the hydrophobic portions of the folded pre-protein with the lipid chains which drives the transmembrane insertion of the M13 procoat protein. Neither the leader sequence nor the mature coat protein alone yields this free energy gain. For the different proteins investigated here, spontaneous membrane insertion occurs only for fluid lipid bilayers, but not for membranes in the crystalline lipid phase. Furthermore, by using lipid bilayers with negative membrane surface charges, it was shown that both procoat and coat proteins are electrostatically attracted to the surface of the lipid membrane, though only to a small extent, with apparent partition coefficients of the same order of magnitude as for the phosphatidylcholine lipid membrane. This work has yielded new information about the structure and the insertion of the phage coat proteins. The new methods developed in this work might be of general applicability to study the structural dynamics of membrane protein assembly.

EPFL1996

Structural characterisation and membrane insertion of M13 procoat, M13 coat and Pf3 coat proteins

EPFL1996