Concept
Subject–auxiliary inversion
Concepts associés (16)
Do-support
Do-support (periphrastic do or do-insertion), in English grammar, is the use of the auxiliary verb do, including its inflected forms does and did, to form negated clauses and questions as well as other constructions in which subject–auxiliary inversion is required. The verb "do" can be used as an auxiliary even in simple declarative sentences, and it usually serves to add emphasis, as in "I did shut the fridge." However, in the negated and inverted clauses referred to above, it is used because the conventions of Modern English syntax permit these constructions only when an auxiliary is present.
Inverse copular constructions
In linguistics, inverse copular constructions, named after Moro (1997), are a type of inversion in English where canonical SCP word order (subject-copula-predicative expression, e.g. Fred is the plumber) is reversed in a sense, so that one appears to have the order PCS instead (predicative expression-copula-subject, e.g. The plumber is Fred). The verb in these constructions is always the copula be (am, are, is, was, were). Inverse copular constructions are intriguing because they render the distinction between subject and predicative expression difficult to maintain.
Inversion (linguistique)
En linguistique, l’inversion est un procédé par lequel on change l’ordre canonique (attendu, consacré, habituel, normal) de deux entités grammaticales, en intervertissant leurs places. Ces entités peuvent être les éléments d’une forme grammaticale composée, les composants d’un syntagme, des termes à fonction syntaxique d’une phrase simple ou des propositions d’une phrase complexe.
Content clause
In grammar, a content clause is a dependent clause that provides content implied or commented upon by an independent clause. The term was coined by Danish linguist Otto Jespersen. They are also known as noun clauses. In English, there are two main kinds of content clauses: declarative content clauses (or that-clauses), which correspond to declarative sentences, and interrogative content clauses, which correspond to interrogative sentences. Declarative content clauses can have a number of different grammatical roles.
Syntactic movement
Syntactic movement is the means by which some theories of syntax address discontinuities. Movement was first postulated by structuralist linguists who expressed it in terms of discontinuous constituents or displacement. Some constituents appear to have been displaced from the position in which they receive important features of interpretation. The concept of movement is controversial and is associated with so-called transformational or derivational theories of syntax (such as transformational grammar, government and binding theory, minimalist program).
Langue V2
Une langue à verbe second, ou en abrégé langue V2, est, en typologie syntaxique, une langue dont les propositions principales ont toujours un verbe comme deuxième constituant. Cette condition n'est pas nécessaire pour les autres types de propositions. L'effet V2 est démontré clairement dans les phrases suivantes en néerlandais : Ik las gisteren dit boek je lus hier ce livre (J'ai lu hier ce livre) Gisteren las ik dit boek hier lus je ce livre (Hier j'ai lu ce livre) Dit boek las ik gisteren ce livre lus je hier (Ce livre, je l'ai lu hier) On peut avoir l'impression que le verbe est en troisième position dans la dernière phrase, mais il en est en fait le deuxième constituant, le premier étant « dit boek » (ce livre).
Déplacement QU-
Dans le domaine de la linguistique, le déplacement QU- est une transformation syntaxique qui concerne le mouvement des syntagmes interrogatifs. Cette opération est appelée « déplacement QU- » parce que plusieurs mots interrogatifs français commencent par les lettres « qu- », tels que qui, que, quoi, quel(le)(s) et quand. Les mots interrogatifs qui ne commencent pas « qu- », mais sont toujours assujettis au deplacement QU-, incluent pourquoi, comment, combien, et où.
Interrogation (linguistique)
En linguistique, l'interrogation est un acte de langage par laquelle l'émetteur d'un énoncé adresse au destinataire (réel ou fictif) de celui-ci une demande d'information portant sur son contenu. Une phrase interrogative est couramment appelée « question ». L'interrogation totale concerne la phrase entière et appelle une réponse totale, comme « oui », « non », « sûrement »... Une telle question totale porte en fait très souvent sur un élément partiel, mis en relief par divers moyens ou non : ex.
Negative inversion
In linguistics, negative inversion is one of many types of subject–auxiliary inversion in English. A negation (e.g. not, no, never, nothing, etc.) or a word that implies negation (only, hardly, scarcely) or a phrase containing one of these words precedes the finite auxiliary verb necessitating that the subject and finite verb undergo inversion. Negative inversion is a phenomenon of English syntax. Other Germanic languages have a more general V2 word order, which allows inversion to occur much more often than in English, so they may not acknowledge negative inversion as a specific phenomenon.
Subject–verb inversion in English
Subject–verb inversion in English is a type of inversion marked by a predicate verb that precedes a corresponding subject, e.g., "Beside the bed stood a lamp". Subject–verb inversion is distinct from subject–auxiliary inversion because the verb involved is not an auxiliary verb. The following sentences illustrate subject–verb inversion. They compare canonical order with the non-standard inversion order, and they demonstrate that subject–verb inversion is unlikely if the subject is a weak (non-stressed) definite pronoun: a.