Are you an EPFL student looking for a semester project?
Work with us on data science and visualisation projects, and deploy your project as an app on top of Graph Search.
Let be a simple linear algebraic group over an algebraically closed field of characteristic . In this thesis, we investigate closed connected reductive subgroups that contain a given distinguished unipotent element of . Our main result is the classification of all such that are maximal among the closed connected subgroups of .
When is simple of exceptional type, the result is easily read from the tables computed by Lawther (J. Algebra, 2009). Our focus is then on the case where is simple of classical type, say , , or . We begin by considering the maximal closed connected subgroups of which belong to one of the families of the so-called \emph{geometric subgroups}. Here the only difficult case is the one where is the stabilizer of a tensor decomposition of . For and , we solve the problem with explicit calculations; for the other tensor product subgroups we apply a result of Barry (Comm. Algebra, 2015).
After the geometric subgroups, the maximal closed connected subgroups that remain are the such that is simple and is an irreducible and tensor indecomposable -module. The bulk of this thesis is concerned with this case. We determine all triples where is a simple algebraic group, is a unipotent element, and is a rational irreducible representation such that is a distinguished unipotent element of . When , this was done in previous work by Liebeck, Seitz and Testerman (Pac. J. Math, 2015).
In the final chapter of the thesis, we consider the more general problem of finding all connected reductive subgroups of that contain a distinguished unipotent element of . This leads us to consider connected reductive overgroups of which are contained in some proper parabolic subgroup of . Testerman and Zalesski (Proc. Am. Math. Soc, 2013) have shown that when is a regular unipotent element of , no such exists. We give several examples which show that their result does not generalize to distinguished unipotent elements. As an extension of the Testerman-Zalesski result, we show that except for two known examples which occur in the case where , a connected reductive overgroup of a distinguished unipotent element of order cannot be contained in a proper parabolic subgroup of .
Donna Testerman, Martin W. Liebeck