Lipid bilayer fusion | EPFL Graph Search

In membrane biology, fusion is the process by which two initially distinct lipid bilayers merge their hydrophobic cores, resulting in one interconnected structure. If this fusion proceeds completely through both leaflets of both bilayers, an aqueous bridge is formed and the internal contents of the two structures can mix. Alternatively, if only one leaflet from each bilayer is involved in the fusion process, the bilayers are said to be hemifused. In hemifusion, the lipid constituents of the outer leaflet of the two bilayers can mix, but the inner leaflets remain distinct. The aqueous contents enclosed by each bilayer also remain separated. Fusion is involved in many cellular processes, particularly in eukaryotes since the eukaryotic cell is extensively sub-divided by lipid bilayer membranes. Exocytosis, fertilization of an egg by sperm and transport of waste products to the lysosome are a few of the many eukaryotic processes that rely on some form of fusion. Fusion is also an importa

Structural characterisation and membrane insertion of M13 procoat, M13 coat and Pf3 coat proteins

Membrane proteins fulfill many central functions in the biological membrane. The insertion process of these proteins and their structure, which are intimately linked to their function, are not yet well understood. As a model we studied three proteins reconstituted into lipid bilayers (which serve as a model for the biological membrane): the major coat proteins of phages Pf3 and M13 and the precursor of the latter, M13 procoat protein, which spans the inner membrane two times and serves as a model for a multi-spanning membrane protein. Whereas Pf3 coat protein can insert into the membrane in its mature form, M13 coat protein needs the signal sequence present in the precursor to insert. A new, simple and efficient purification method has been developed for M13 procoat, M13 and Pf3 coat proteins. Homogenous preparations were obtained in isopropanol/0.l% TFA, where M13 coat protein is found to be dissolved in a monomeric form, and the two other proteins as dimers. The conformations of these particular proteins in different environments have been determined by circular dichroism and infrared spectroscopy. In organic solvents, the proteins adopt a conformation with an average helix content of 90%. In lipid bilayers composed of phospatidylcholine and phosphatidylglycerol lipids, the average helix content is 50% for M13 procoat protein, 60% for M13 coat protein and 75% for Pf3 coat protein. In order to characterize the orientational distribution the orientational order parameter Sα of the protein helices in planar lipid bilayers have been determined by polarized infrared measurements in the amide I spectral range. The helices of the three proteins are oriented preferentially parallel to the membrane normal, with Sα = 0.63 for M13 procoat protein, Sα = 0.58 for Pf3 coat protein and a distinctly higher value of Sα = 0.81 for M13 coat protein. The topology of M13 and Pf3 coat proteins was investigated using limited proteolysis in lipid vesicles with proteinase K combined with mass spectroscopy to analyze the lytic fragments. The C-terminal part of both proteins was found to be inaccessible to proteinase K, only 14 (Pf3) or 15 (M13) residues on the N-terminal were protease accessible from the outside of the vesicles. Furthermore, the standard free energy change, ΔGo, of a membrane-inserting protein with a leader sequence has been determined experimentally for the first time, using M13 procoat protein as an example. The partition coefficient for the distribution of this protein between the aqueous phase and the membrane phase of preformed lipid vesicles yielded a value of Γ = 6.5×105 M-1, corresponding to a ΔGo of -10.4 kcal/mol, based on measurements of the fluorescence energy transfer between the intrinsic tryptophan of the protein and a suitably labeled lipid membrane of POPC. For comparison, the partition coefficient of the M13 coat protein between the aqueous and the POPC lipid bilayer phase was determined to be distinctly lower: Γ = 1×105 M-1 (ΔGo = -9.3 kcal/mol). Proteinase K digestion experiments have been performed, showing that 20% of the procoat protein bound to lipid vesicles spontaneously integrate in a transbilayer form, whereas 80% remain inserted in the interfacial membrane region. By taking together these results, an upper limit for the free energy change of the transmembrane insertion of procoat protein was estimated to be -14.8 kcal/mol. In order to distinguish further the contribution arising from insertion of the procoat protein into the membrane interfacial region from that due to transmembrane insertion, the partition coefficient of a mutant procoat protein OM30R (which contains a positively charged amino acid in its mature hydrophobic segment (exchange of a Val to an Arg residue at position 30)) was determined, yielding Γ = 0.3×105 M-1 (ΔGo = -8.6 kcal/mol). Previously reported in vivo experiments have shown that the OM30R mutant protein is not translocated across Escherichia coli inner membrane, but only binds to the inner surface. The results presented here indicate that although the insertion of the procoat protein into the interfacial region of the lipid bilayer contributes the major part to ΔGo, it is the final energy gain of the interaction of the hydrophobic portions of the folded pre-protein with the lipid chains which drives the transmembrane insertion of the M13 procoat protein. Neither the leader sequence nor the mature coat protein alone yields this free energy gain. For the different proteins investigated here, spontaneous membrane insertion occurs only for fluid lipid bilayers, but not for membranes in the crystalline lipid phase. Furthermore, by using lipid bilayers with negative membrane surface charges, it was shown that both procoat and coat proteins are electrostatically attracted to the surface of the lipid membrane, though only to a small extent, with apparent partition coefficients of the same order of magnitude as for the phosphatidylcholine lipid membrane. This work has yielded new information about the structure and the insertion of the phage coat proteins. The new methods developed in this work might be of general applicability to study the structural dynamics of membrane protein assembly.

EPFL1996

Tension-induced fusion of bilayer membranes and vesicles

Julian Charles Shillcock

Maintaining the integrity of their protective plasma membrane is a primary requirement of cells. Accordingly, cellular events that breach the membrane are tightly regulated1. Artificial vesicles used in drug delivery must also stay intact until they have reached the desired target2. In both cases, the intrinsic resistance of the membrane to rupture must be overcome to allow the efflux of the vesicle’s contents. Here, we use mesoscopic simulations3 to study the fusion of 28-nm-diameter vesicles to 50 × 50 nm2 planar membrane patches over 2 μs. We monitor the time evolution of 93 different fusion attempts. This allows us to construct a global morphology diagram, using the initial tensions of the vesicle and the planar membrane patch as control parameters, and to determine the corresponding fusion statistics. All successful fusion events are observed to occur within 350 ns, which reflects the presence of alternative pathways for the tension relaxation.

Nature Publishing Group2005

Reporting Guidelines, Review of Methodological Standards, and Challenges Toward Harmonization in Bone Marrow Adiposity Research. Report of the Methodologies Working Group of the International Bone Marrow Adiposity Society

Olaia Maria Naveiras Torres-Quiroga, Josefine Catharina Pedersen Tratwal

The interest in bone marrow adiposity (BMA) has increased over the last decade due to its association with, and potential role, in a range of diseases (osteoporosis, diabetes, anorexia, cancer) as well as treatments (corticosteroid, radiation, chemotherapy, thiazolidinediones). However, to advance the field of BMA research, standardization of methods is desirable to increase comparability of study outcomes and foster collaboration. Therefore, at the 2017 annual BMA meeting, the International Bone Marrow Adiposity Society (BMAS) founded a working group to evaluate methodologies in BMA research. All BMAS members could volunteer to participate. The working group members, who are all active preclinical or clinical BMA researchers, searched the literature for articles investigating BMA and discussed the results during personal and telephone conferences. According to the consensus opinion, both based on the review of the literature and on expert opinion, we describe existing methodologies and discuss the challenges and future directions for (1) histomorphometry of bone marrow adipocytes, (2) ex vivo BMA imaging, (3) in vivo BMA imaging, (4) cell isolation, culture, differentiation and in vitro modulation of primary bone marrow adipocytes and bone marrow stromal cell precursors, (5) lineage tracing and in vivo BMA modulation, and (6) BMA biobanking. We identify as accepted standards in BMA research: manual histomorphometry and osmium tetroxide 3D contrast-enhanced μCT for ex vivo quantification, specific MRI sequences (WFI and H-MRS) for in vivo studies, and RT-qPCR with a minimal four gene panel or lipid-based assays for in vitro quantification of bone marrow adipogenesis. Emerging techniques are described which may soon come to complement or substitute these gold standards. Known confounding factors and minimal reporting standards are presented, and their use is encouraged to facilitate comparison across studies. In conclusion, specific BMA methodologies have been developed. However, important challenges remain. In particular, we advocate for the harmonization of methodologies, the precise reporting of known confounding factors, and the identification of methods to modulate BMA independently from other tissues. Wider use of existing animal models with impaired BMA production (e.g., Pfrt−/−, KitW/W−v) and development of specific BMA deletion models would be highly desirable for this purpose.

2020

Structural characterisation and membrane insertion of M13 procoat, M13 coat and Pf3 coat proteins

EPFL1996

Olaia Maria Naveiras Torres-Quiroga, Josefine Catharina Pedersen Tratwal

2020