Regulator gene | EPFL Graph Search

A regulator gene, regulator, or regulatory gene is a gene involved in controlling the expression of one or more other genes. Regulatory sequences, which encode regulatory genes, are often at the five prime end (5') to the start site of transcription of the gene they regulate. In addition, these sequences can also be found at the three prime end (3') to the transcription start site. In both cases, whether the regulatory sequence occurs before (5') or after (3') the gene it regulates, the sequence is often many kilobases away from the transcription start site. A regulator gene may encode a protein, or it may work at the level of RNA, as in the case of genes encoding microRNAs. An example of a regulator gene is a gene that codes for a repressor protein that inhibits the activity of an operator (a gene which binds repressor proteins thus inhibiting the translation of RNA to protein via RNA polymerase). In prokaryotes, regulator genes often code for repressor proteins. Repressor proteins bind to operators or promoters, preventing RNA polymerase from transcribing RNA. They are usually constantly expressed so the cell always has a supply of repressor molecules on hand. Inducers cause repressor proteins to change shape or otherwise become unable to bind DNA, allowing RNA polymerase to continue transcription. Regulator genes can be located within an operon, adjacent to it, or far away from it. Other regulatory genes code for activator proteins. An activator binds to a site on the DNA molecule and causes an increase in transcription of a nearby gene. In prokaryotes, a well-known activator protein is the catabolite activator protein (CAP), involved in positive control of the lac operon. In the regulation of gene expression, studied in evolutionary developmental biology (evo-devo), both activators and repressors play important roles. Regulatory genes can also be described as positive or negative regulators, based on the environmental conditions that surround the cell.

Isolation and Analysis of Regulators Coordinating the Nuclear Cycle with Cytokinesis in Schizosaccharomyces Pombe

Evelyn Lattmann

During the division of a mother cell into two daughter cells the genetic material of the mother cell is replicated and segregated to the daughter cells before the cytoplasm divides into two portions in a process called cytokinesis. In order to maintain the genetic stability of the daughter cells it is crucial that the bisection of the cells only occurs once the genetic material has been faithfully partitioned. In the model organism S. pombe the timely coordination of cytokinesis is regulated by a cellular signaling cascade called the Septation Initiation Network (SIN). The SIN is required for the formation and contraction of the contractile actomyosin ring (CAR) that assembles in the cell centre and guides the centripetal deposition of septum material during its contraction. Most of the regulators of the SIN are located to the SPB at some stage of the cell cycle. Interestingly, in anaphase B, when the SIN is supposed to be fully active, positive and negative regulators of the SIN localize to opposite SPBs. This asymmetric configuration of the SIN is lost at the end of cytokinesis, when the SIN is turned off; the positive regulators dissociate from the new SPB and the negative regulators assemble on this SPB. In order to understand this process in more detail we analyzed the localization of Cdc7p, a positive regulator of the SIN. We found that the disappearance of Cdc7p from the new SPB at the end of cytokinesis correlated with the separation of the two halves of the cytoplasm. Moreover, our data suggested that the separation of the two SPBs resulting from the completion of septum formation is important for the resetting of the SIN. Interestingly, we observed that Sid2p, the downstream effector of the SIN, was important for the maintenance of asymmetry in anaphase B and for the timing of the resetting of the SIN by acting in a negative feedback. Taken together, we suggested a model where the downstream effector of the SIN may promote the loading of the negative regulators to the SPBs; in anaphase to the old SPB (due to higher affinity of the negative regulators for this SPB) and upon cell separation to both SPBs, because the old SPB cannot buffer the negative feedback. In a separate study we designed a screen to isolate new regulators of the SIN. Mutagenesis of a strain that over-expressed spg1, the core activator of the SIN, led to the isolation of 28 mutants that are dependent on high levels of Spg1p for viability. The characterization of the nine heat-sensitive mutants among them revealed that they are all new alleles of known SIN genes. Interestingly, two mutants that mapped to the SIN effector sid2, lysed at the time of cytokinesis, when shifted to the restrictive temperature. This observation points to a possible role of the SIN in regulating cell separation. Surprisingly, one of the mutants that mapped to the essential positive SIN regulator sid1 contained a premature STOP codon after 243 nucleotides. The analysis of this mutant revealed that translational read-through level of the STOP codon is sufficient for successful cytokinesis. Similarly, high levels of sid1 expression did not interfere with cytokinesis. This indicated that the regulation of the SIN by Sid1p does not depend on its levels but on a precise control of its action. Since over expression of sid1 led to the accumulation of the protein in the nucleus this may hint that Sid1p recruitment to the SPB is regulated by nuclear proteins.

EPFL2012

Asymmetric Spindle Positioning and Intracellular Trafficking in C. Elegans Embryos

Kalyani Thyagarajan

Asymmetric cell division is critical for generating daughter cells that possess distinct fates during development and in stem cell lineages. Correct orientation of the mitotic spindle with respect to the polarity axis is crucial to this process. In the one-cell stage embryo of the nematode C. elegans, polarity cues define an anterior-posterior axis, and the mitotic spindle is positioned asymmetrically towards the posterior of the embryo in response to these cues, resulting in daughter cells that differ not only in fates, but also in sizes. Although the way by which force is generated has becoming increasingly well understood, the mechanisms by which polarity cues regulate the asymmetric distribution of active cortical force generators that pull on astral microtubules to position the spindle remained unclear at the onset of my thesis. During the course of our work, we found that intracellular trafficking plays a crucial role in the distribution and levels of proteins involved in asymmetric spindle positioning. Firstly, we found that the distribution of the Gβ protein GPB-1, a negative regulator of pulling forces, varies across the cell cycle, with levels at the cell membrane being lowest during mitosis. GPB-1 transits through the endosomal network in a dynamin-, clathrin- and RAB-5-dependent manner. We also found that GPB-1 trafficking is more pronounced on the anterior side and that this asymmetry is regulated by A-P polarity cues. In addition, we demonstrate that GPB-1 depletion results in the loss of GPR-1/2 asymmetry during mitosis, and thus symmetric pulling forces during mitosis. Secondly, we found that the clathrin heavy chain modulates spindle-positioning forces as well as the cortical distribution of positive (GPR-1/2 and DHC-1) and negative (GPB-1 and LET-99) regulators of pulling forces. Although the mechanisms by which it does so remain unclear, our data suggests that clathrin plays multiple roles in the one-cell stage C. elegans embryos, including in recycling GPB-1 to the plasma membrane. Overall, our results lead us to propose that the clathrin heavy chain and the modulation of Gβγ trafficking play a critical role during asymmetric division of one-cell stage C. elegans embryos.

EPFL2011

The May-Hegglin anomaly gene MYH9 is a negative regulator of platelet biogenesis modulated by the Rho-ROCK pathway

Olaia Maria Naveiras Torres-Quiroga, Zhao Chen

The gene implicated in the May-Hegglin anomaly and related macrothrombocytopenias, MYH9, encodes myosin-IIA, a protein that enables morphogenesis in diverse cell types. Defective myosin-IIA complexes are presumed to perturb megakaryocyte (MK) differentiation or generation of proplatelets. We observed that Myh9(-/-) mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells differentiate into MKs that are fully capable of proplatelet formation (PPF). In contrast, elevation of myosin-IIA activity, by exogenous expression or by mimicking constitutive phosphorylation of its regulatory myosin light chain (MLC), significantly attenuates PPF. This effect occurs only in the presence of myosin-IIA and implies that myosin-IIA influences thrombopoiesis negatively. MLC phosphorylation in MKs is regulated by Rho-associated kinase (ROCK), and consistent with our model, ROCK inhibition enhances PPF. Conversely, expression of AV14, a constitutive form of the ROCK activator Rho, blocks PPF, and this effect is rescued by simultaneous expression of a dominant inhibitory MLC form. Hematopoietic transplantation studies in mice confirm that interference with the putative Rho-ROCK-myosin-IIA pathway selectively decreases the number of circulating platelets. Our studies unveil a key regulatory pathway for platelet biogenesis and hint at Sdf-1/CXCL12 as one possible extracellular mediator. The unexpected mechanism for Myh9-associated thrombocytopenia may lead to new molecular approaches to manipulate thrombopoiesis.

American Society of Hematology2007