Résumé
The scientific community is a diverse network of interacting scientists. It includes many "sub-communities" working on particular scientific fields, and within particular institutions; interdisciplinary and cross-institutional activities are also significant. Objectivity is expected to be achieved by the scientific method. Peer review, through discussion and debate within journals and conferences, assists in this objectivity by maintaining the quality of research methodology and interpretation of results. History of science The eighteenth century had some societies made up of men who studied nature, also known as natural philosophers and natural historians, which included even amateurs. As such these societies were more like local clubs and groups with diverse interests than actual scientific communities, which usually had interests on specialized disciplines. Though there were a few older societies of men who studied nature such as the Royal Society of London, the concept of scientific communities emerged in the second half of the 19th century, not before, because it was in this century that the language of modern science emerged, the professionalization of science occurred, specialized institutions were created, and the specialization of scientific disciplines and fields occurred. For instance, the term scientist was first coined by the naturalist-theologian William Whewell in 1834 and the wider acceptance of the term along with the growth of specialized societies allowed for researchers to see themselves as a part of a wider imagined community, similar to the concept of nationhood. Membership in the community is generally, but not exclusively, a function of education, employment status, research activity and institutional affiliation. Status within the community is highly correlated with publication record, and also depends on the status within the institution and the status of the institution. Researchers can hold roles of different degrees of influence inside the scientific community.
À propos de ce résultat
Cette page est générée automatiquement et peut contenir des informations qui ne sont pas correctes, complètes, à jour ou pertinentes par rapport à votre recherche. Il en va de même pour toutes les autres pages de ce site. Veillez à vérifier les informations auprès des sources officielles de l'EPFL.
Cours associés (23)
PHYS-754: Lecture series on scientific machine learning
This lecture presents ongoing work on how scientific questions can be tackled using machine learning. Machine learning enables extracting knowledge from data computationally and in an automatized way.
AR-679: IMAGES AND NUMBERS. 8th Les Rencontres de l'EDAR
The eighth edition of Les Rencontres de l'EDAR invites doctoral students to reflect on scientific visualisation, referring to their own experience as young scholars - whether related to their PhD diss
EE-625: Research seminars in Electrical Engineering
This course introduces students with current broad research directions in electrical engineering, via a series of weekly wide-audience seminars given by distinguished speakers. The students practice t
Afficher plus
Séances de cours associées (51)
La littérature neuroscientifique : présentation et discussion
Couvre le format d'une présentation de club de journal dans la littérature neuroscientifique.
L'essentiel du carnet de notes de laboratoire
Souligne l'importance d'un cahier de laboratoire bien entretenu comme document essentiel pour les expériences, axé sur l'exactitude et la documentation détaillée.
Notebook de laboratoire: Importance, contenu et maintenance
Souligne l'importance de maintenir un bon cahier de laboratoire en sciences et en génie, couvrant le contenu et les lignes directrices de maintenance.
Afficher plus
Publications associées (114)
Concepts associés (16)
Metascience
Metascience (also known as meta-research) is the use of scientific methodology to study science itself. Metascience seeks to increase the quality of scientific research while reducing inefficiency. It is also known as "research on research" and "the science of science", as it uses research methods to study how research is done and find where improvements can be made. Metascience concerns itself with all fields of research and has been described as "a bird's eye view of science".
Politisation de la science
vignette|Infographie issue de "Consensus on Consensus" par Cook et al. (2016). Utilisation de graphiques en camembert pour illustrer les résultats de sept études sur le consensus climatique réalisées par Naomi Oreskes, Peter Doran, William Anderegg, Bart Verheggen, Ed Maibach, J. Stuart Carlton, et John Cook. La politisation de la science désigne la manipulation de la science pour en tirer un profit politique.
Rejection of evolution by religious groups
Recurring cultural, political, and theological rejection of evolution by religious groups exists regarding the origins of the Earth, of humanity, and of other life. In accordance with creationism, species were once widely believed to be fixed products of divine creation, but since the mid-19th century, evolution by natural selection has been established by the scientific community as an empirical scientific fact.
Afficher plus