Modus tollens

In propositional logic, modus tollens (ˈmoʊdəs_ˈtɒlɛnz) (MT), also known as modus tollendo tollens (Latin for "method of removing by taking away") and denying the consequent, is a deductive argument form and a rule of inference. Modus tollens takes the form of "If P, then Q. Not Q. Therefore, not P." It is an application of the general truth that if a statement is true, then so is its contrapositive. The form shows that inference from P implies Q to the negation of Q implies the negation of P is a valid argument. The history of the inference rule modus tollens goes back to antiquity. The first to explicitly describe the argument form modus tollens was Theophrastus. Modus tollens is closely related to modus ponens. There are two similar, but invalid, forms of argument: affirming the consequent and denying the antecedent. See also contraposition and proof by contrapositive. The form of a modus tollens argument resembles a syllogism, with two premises and a conclusion: If P, then Q. Not Q. Therefore, not P. The first premise is a conditional ("if-then") claim, such as P implies Q. The second premise is an assertion that Q, the consequent of the conditional claim, is not the case. From these two premises it can be logically concluded that P, the antecedent of the conditional claim, is also not the case. For example: If the dog detects an intruder, the dog will bark. The dog did not bark. Therefore, no intruder was detected by the dog. Supposing that the premises are both true (the dog will bark if it detects an intruder, and does indeed not bark), it follows that no intruder has been detected. This is a valid argument since it is not possible for the conclusion to be false if the premises are true. (It is conceivable that there may have been an intruder that the dog did not detect, but that does not invalidate the argument; the first premise is "if the dog detects an intruder". The thing of importance is that the dog detects or does not detect an intruder, not whether there is one.) Another example: If I am the axe murderer, then I can use an axe.

Disabling conditional inferences: An EEG study

Mariia Kaliuzhna

Although the Modus Ponens inference is one of the most basic logical rules, decades of conditional reasoning research show that it is often rejected when people consider stored background knowledge about potential disabling conditions. In the present study ...

Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd2014

SC-TPTP: An Extension of the TPTP Derivation Format for Sequent-Based Calculus

Disabling conditional inferences: An EEG study

Extending OWL with Explicit Dependency

Extending OWL with Explicit Dependency

SC-TPTP: An Extension of the TPTP Derivation Format for Sequent-Based Calculus

Disabling conditional inferences: An EEG study