Academic dishonesty, academic misconduct, academic fraud and academic integrity are related concepts that refer to various actions on the part of students that go against the expected norms of a school, university or other learning institution. Definitions of academic misconduct are usually outlined in institutional policies. Therefore, academic dishonesty consists of many different categories of behaviour, as opposed to being a singular concept.
Academic dishonesty dates back to the first tests. Scholars note that cheating was prevalent on the Chinese civil service exams thousands of years ago, even when cheating carried the penalty of death for both examinee and examiner. Bribery of examiners was also common, as represented in works such as the Ming-dynasty story collection The Book of Swindles
Standards for citation and referencing began at the end of the 19th century with the emergence of guidance provided by scholarly societies that developed discipline-specific expectations for referencing such as the MLA and the APA. About the same time, scholars began researching issues related to cheating, with some early research dating back to the late 19th century and early 20th centuries, when cheating was identified as a widespread problem at college campuses in the United States. It has been estimated that as many as two-thirds of students cheated at some point of their college careers at the turn of the 20th century. Fraternities often operated so-called essay banks, where term papers were kept on file and could be resubmitted over and over again by different students, often with the only change being the name on the paper. The issue of academic dishonesty became more prominent in the latter half of the twentieth century, as universities shifted towards more democratic approaches to admission.
Academic dishonesty does not have a universal definition. Educational institutions in different regions understand and act on academic dishonesty in different ways.
Cette page est générée automatiquement et peut contenir des informations qui ne sont pas correctes, complètes, à jour ou pertinentes par rapport à votre recherche. Il en va de même pour toutes les autres pages de ce site. Veillez à vérifier les informations auprès des sources officielles de l'EPFL.
vignette|Le critique littéraire et philologue vivant à Bagdad, al-Hatimi († 988), accuse le poète al-Mutanabbi de plagier dans sa poésie (en noir) Aristote (en rouge). Le plagiat est une faute d'ordre moral, civil ou commercial, qui peut être sanctionnée au pénal. Elle consiste à copier un auteur, ou accaparer l'œuvre d'un créateur dans le domaine des arts, sans le citer ou le dire, ainsi qu'à fortement s'inspirer d'un modèle que l'on omet, délibérément ou par négligence, de désigner. Il est souvent assimilé à un vol immatériel.
Un nègre littéraire, ou simplement nègre, également appelé prête-plume ou écrivain fantôme, est l’auteur « sous-traitant » et anonyme d’un texte signé par une autre personne, souvent célèbre. L’emploi du mot « nègre » dans cette acception date du milieu du , en référence à l’exploitation des populations noires d’Afrique. L'expression étant aujourd'hui contestée en raison de son origine, le substitut « prête-plume » est recommandé par le ministère de la Culture français et l'Office québécois de la langue française.
Source criticism (or information evaluation) is the process of evaluating an information source, i.e.: a document, a person, a speech, a fingerprint, a photo, an observation, or anything used in order to obtain knowledge. In relation to a given purpose, a given information source may be more or less valid, reliable or relevant. Broadly, "source criticism" is the interdisciplinary study of how information sources are evaluated for given tasks.
This thesis presents four essays providing novel empirical and theoretical insights on the incentives and institutional structures that favor knowledge production and diffusion. The first two studies analyze these processes in the realm of scientific resea ...
EPFL2020
,
The ability to process optical signals without passing into the electrical domain has always attracted the attention of the research community. Processing photons by photons unfolds new scenarios, in principle allowing for unseen signal processing and comp ...
The evaluation of scientific research is crucial for both the academic community and society as a whole. Numerous bibliometric indices have been proposed for the ranking of research performance, mainly on an ad hoc basis. We introduce the novel class of Sc ...