Cortex préfrontal | EPFL Graph Search

Le cortex préfrontal est la partie antérieure du cortex du lobe frontal du cerveau, située en avant des régions prémotrices. Cette région est le siège de différentes fonctions cognitives dites supérieures (notamment le langage, la mémoire de travail, le raisonnement, et plus généralement les fonctions exécutives). C'est aussi la région du goût et de l'odorat. Définition Il existe trois possibilités pour définir le cortex préfrontal :

le cortex frontal possédant une couche IV granulaire ;
la zone de projection du noyau médiodorsal du thalamus ;
la zone du cortex frontal dont la stimulation n'évoque aucun mouvement.

En 1935, Jacobsen utilisa le terme de préfrontal pour désigner la zone du frontal contenant une couche IV granulaire (avec des cellules étoilées et pyramidales) en opposition des aires motrices et prémotrices, agranulaires. Dans la classification de Brodmann, le cortex préfrontal regroupe les aires 8, 9, 10, 11, 44, 45, 46, 47 sur la face latérale, et 1

Where does the engram come from? Study of prefrontal cortex inputs during memory consolidation

Lucie Pauline Dixsaut

The formation and storage of memories has been under deep investigation for several decades. Nevertheless, the precise contribution of each brain region involved in this process and the interplay between them across memory consolidation is still largely debated. Although memory encoding requires the hippocampus (HPC), it is becoming apparent that other brain regions are also important in early phases of memory formation, such as the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). In addition, engram cells have been found in the mPFC at memory encoding: these cells represent a close approximation of the "memory trace" insofar as they are activated at the time of learning, as they undergo enduring molecular modifications after learning, and as their reactivation drives memory recall. In contrast to HPC engram cells, mPFC engram cells are thought to be kept silent during a recent recall and until the memory is fully consolidated, becoming active only at remote recall. To explain the dynamics of these mPFC engram cells, we hypothesized that inputs to the mPFC could be differentially activated over the course of memory consolidation.We first determined that the prelimbic cortex (PL), a subregion of the mPFC, was specifically activated during the encoding phase of a fear memory in mice by measuring the expression of the Immediate Early Gene cFos, transcribed upon neuronal activation. We then traced the inputs of PL cells that were active during encoding, the putative PL engram cells, in order screen for relevant connections for further investigations. To achieve this, we used an activity-dependent monosynaptic retrograde tracing method based on rabies tracing. Then, to determine the activation patterns of these specific PL inputs, we measured their activity throughout consolidation of a contextual fear memory using an unbiased retrograde tracer coupled with cFos immunostaining. We further tested their functional relevance by chemogenetically inhibiting these projections during the different learning phases. This approach confirmed the roles of the Entorhinal Cortex and the Basolateral Amygdala inputs during the encoding phase of a fear memory to later recall remote memories. In addition, we found that the Claustrum (CLA) to PL projection was also required during the encoding phase, but to recall recent memories specifically. Moreover, the Insular Cortex (INS) to PL projection was necessary during recent recall. Eventually, we observed that the CLA and INS manipulations led to a modification of PL engram cells reactivation during recent recall.Overall, our results suggest that there is a functional shift in PL inputs during the course of memory consolidation, which is also impacting how PL engram cells are reactivated. In addition, we observed that the activity of PL inputs is part of a broader brain network, both through the presence of axon collaterals targeting other brain regions and by the existence of parallel and perhaps redundant pathways that could ensure efficient memory consolidation.Collectively, our data help to further refine the working model of memory formation by deciphering the interplay between brain regions during the process of systems consolidation of a fear memory, and open several questions for future investigations.

EPFL2022

Dysfunction of homeostatic control of dopamine by astrocytes in the developing prefrontal cortex leads to cognitive impairments

Corrado Cali, Andrea Chicca, Nicole Déglon, Graham Knott, Luca Pucci, Tamara Zehnder

Astrocytes orchestrate neural development by powerfully coordinating synapse formation and function and, as such, may be critically involved in the pathogenesis of neurodevelopmental abnormalities and cognitive deficits commonly observed in psychiatric disorders. Here, we report the identification of a subset of cortical astrocytes that are competent for regulating dopamine (DA) homeostasis during postnatal development of the prefrontal cortex (PFC), allowing for optimal DA-mediated maturation of excitatory circuits. Such control of DA homeostasis occurs through the coordinated activity of astroglial vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT2) together with organic cation transporter 3 and monoamine oxidase type B, two key proteins for DA uptake and metabolism. Conditional deletion of VMAT2 in astrocytes postnatally produces loss of PFC DA homeostasis, leading to defective synaptic transmission and plasticity as well as impaired executive functions. Our findings show a novel role for PFC astrocytes in the DA modulation of cognitive performances with relevance to psychiatric disorders.

2020

Amplified engagement of prefrontal cortex during control of voluntary action in Tourette syndrome

Sophie Jacqueline Andrée Betka

Tourette syndrome is characterized by 'unvoluntary' tics, which are compulsive, yet often temporarily suppressible. The inferior frontal gyms is implicated in motor control, including inhibition of pre-potent actions through influences on downstream subcortical and motor regions. Although tic suppression in Tourette syndrome also engages the inferior frontal gyrus, it is unclear whether such prefrontal control of action is also dysfunctional: Tic suppression studies do not permit comparison with control groups, and neuroimaging studies of motor inhibition can be confounded by the concurrent expression or suppression of tics. Here, patients with Tourette syndrome were directly compared to control participants when performing an intentional inhibition task during functional MRL Tic expression was recorded throughout for removal from statistical models. Participants were instructed to make a button press in response to Go cues, withhold responses to NoGo cues, and decide whether to press or withhold to 'Choose' cues. Overall performance was similar between groups, for both intentional inhibition rates (% Choose-Go) and reactive NoGo inhibition commission errors. A subliminal face prime elicited no additional effects on intentional or reactive inhibition. Across participants, the task activated prefrontal and motor cortices and subcortical nuclei, including pre-supplementary motor area, inferior frontal gyrus, insula, caudate nucleus, thalamus and primary motor cortex. In Tourette syndrome, activity was elevated in the inferior frontal gyrus, insula and basal ganglia, most notably within the right inferior frontal gyrus during voluntary action and inhibition (Choose-Go and Choose-NoGo), and reactive inhibition (NoGo-correct). Anatomically, the locus of this inferior frontal gyrus hyperactivation during control of voluntary action matched that previously reported for tic suppression. In Tourette syndrome, activity within the caudate nucleus was also enhanced during both intentional (Choose-NoGo) and reactive (NoGo-correct) inhibition. Strikingly, despite the absence of overt motor behaviour, primary motor cortex activity increased in patients with Tourette syndrome but decreased in controls during both reactive and intentional inhibition. Additionally, severity of premonitory sensations scaled with functional connectivity of the pre-supplementary motor area to the caudate nucleus, globus pallidus and thalamus when choosing to respond (Choose-Go). Together, these results suggest that patients with Tourette syndrome use equivalent prefrontal mechanisms to suppress tics and withhold non-tic actions, but require greater inferior frontal gyrus engagement than controls to overcome motor drive from hyperactive downstream regions, notably primary motor cortex. Moreover, premonitory sensations may cue midline motor regions to generate tics through interactions with the basal ganglia.

OXFORD UNIV PRESS2020